Popular Posts

Monday, March 30, 2015

Francis Scott Key's Grandson Was Held Prisoner at Ft McHenry



          Did you know that Francis Key Howard, the grandson of Francis Scott Key, was imprisoned in Fort McHenry forty-seven years to the day (September 13, 1861) after his grandfather had witnessed the British Royal Navy bombard that fort during the War of 1812 on September 13, 1814?




          Not long after the South had seceded from the United States, President Abraham Lincoln authorized his general, Winfield Scott, to suspend the writ of habeas corpus on April 27, 1861.[1] Lincoln gave power to the army to arrest and detain American citizens at will and without the due process of law: 
“You are engaged in repressing an insurrection against the laws of the United States. If at any point on or in the vicinity of any military line which is now or which shall be used between the city of Philadelphia and the city of Washington you find resistance which renders it necessary to suspend the writ of habeas corpus for the public safety, you personally or through the officer in command at the point where resistance occurs, are authorized to suspend that writ.”[2] With that right suspended, thousands of Northern citizens were illegally arrested by the army and held in military prisons from months to years during the duration of the war. Francis Key Howard was one of the many who were arrested.


Many were incarcerated simply for exercising their First Amendment right to speak their opinion and criticize the actions of the Lincoln Administration. No state in the North was safe, as many would find out in the State of Maryland. With disregard for constitutional law and due process, Lincoln disbanded the police force in Baltimore and had the Mayor, a member of Congress, editors, and private citizens arrested without any specific charges against them.[3] Howard, an editor for a newspaper which had been printing anti-Lincoln sentiments in Baltimore, was one of the many men who were arrested in that city during the first year of the war.[4]
Just after midnight on September 13, 1861, several men under orders from Secretary of State Seward entered Howard’s home and arrested him.[5] The “gang” of men, who entered his home, also violated his Fourth Amendment right; when without a warrant, they ransacked every room of his house and carried off all his “private memoranda, bills, note-books, and letters.”[6] Howard was taken to Fort McHenry, where he was accompanied by fifteen others that day, who were also arrested and drug out of their homes; “most of the members of the Legislature from Baltimore, Mr. Brown, the Mayor of the City, and one of [their] Representatives in Congress, Mr. May” joined Howard at the fort.[7] He was aware of the irony of the situation and later wrote about it in an account of his imprisonment:

When I looked out in the morning, I could not help being struck by an odd and not pleasant coincidence. On that day, forty-seven years before, my grandfather, Mr. F. S. Key, then a prisoner on a British ship, had witnessed the bombardment of Fort McHenry. When on the following morning, the hostile fleet drew off, defeated, he wrote the song so long popular throughout the country, the “Star-spangled Banner.” As I stood upon the very scene of that conflict, I could not but contrast my position with his, forty-sever years before. The flag which he had then so proudly hailed, I saw waving, at the same place, over the victims of as vulgar and brutal a despotism as modern times have witnessed.[8]






[1] George Clarke Sellery, Lincoln's Suspension of Habeas Corpus as Viewed by Congress, (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1907), 7.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Francis Key Howard, Fourteen Months in American Bastiles, (Baltimore: Kelly, Hedian and Piet, 1863), 4-5.
[4] Thomas J. DiLorenzo, The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, (New York: Three Rivers Press, 2003), 133-134.
[5] Francis Key Howard, Fourteen Months in American Bastiles, 7.
[6] Ibid, 8.
[7] Ibid, 9.
[8] Ibid. 

Star Spangled Banner Facts


Did you know facts about the Star Spangled Banner:

You probably knew that the Star Spangled Banner was written by Francis Scott Key after he witnessed the British Royal Navy’s assault on Fort McHenry in Baltimore Harbor on September 13, 1814, during the War of 1812.


But did you know that he first published his poem under the title of Defence of Fort M’Henry?[1]


The poem was renamed to the Star Spangled Banner and was suggested to be sung with an already familiar English drinking song.

Did you know that English drinking song was To Anacreon in Heaven? Key had previously used that same song with another poem he wrote in 1805, When the Warrior Returns from the Battle Afar. [2]

Did you know that the Star Spangled Banner was not made the official national anthem of the United States of America until President Herbert Hoover signed Congressman John Linthicum’s (D-Maryland) bill, H.R. 14, on March 3, 1931?[3]



[1] Norman Gelb, “Francis Scott Key, the Reluctant Patriot,” Smithsonian.com, September 2004, http://www.smithsonianmag.com/people-places/francis-scott-key-the-reluctant-patriot-180937178/?no-ist%3Fall=&page=3.
[2] “The Melody,” Smithsonian: National Museum of American History, accessed on March 19, 2015, http://amhistory.si.edu/starspangledbanner/the-melody.aspx.
[3] “The Designation of the ‘Star-Spangled Banner,’” United States House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives, accessed on March 19, 2015, http://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1901-1950/The-designation-of-the-%E2%80%9CStar-Spangled-Banner%E2%80%9D/.

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Stop, Drop, and Roll is 205 Years Old?

            What person today has not been taught the principle to stop, drop, and roll when they catch fire? Ask anyone on the street and they should know this basic fire safety tip; however, when did this brilliant concept first come to light? Did you know this fundamental principle, which has saved countless lives, can be dated back to the experiment of Sir Richard Phillips in 1810? That is right, stop, drop, and roll is a concept that is at least a two hundred and five year old! There is a good reason why Sir Phillips set out to discover this principle when he did; it is because the good old days were dangerous around the fireside and something had to be done to prevent the many fire related deaths so prevalent during this time.
            Not too long ago in human history, it was not uncommon for a woman in a long dress working near a hearth, or a child playing by a warm fireplace, to have their clothing catch on fire. The Monthly Magazine and British Register article that published and detailed Sir Phillip’s fire experiment, reported that “four ladies and three children [had] already burn[ed] to death within the present winter.”[1] Even the Vermont Telegraph, twenty-six years later in 1836, had stated that these fire related deaths frequently “happen[ed] every year,” when they recounted Sir Phillip’s experiment as a fire safety tip its readers.[2] “A fate more dreadful…than that of being burned to death” now could be adverted with Sir Phillip’s sound and scientific advice, the American newspaper reported.[3]


            In Sir Phillip’s experiment, he took two separate pieces of material made of “muslin,” and set them on fire, which would offer interesting results.[4] When one strip was held up vertically and lit at its base; and in “half a minute,” it was engulfed in flames “rising with great intensity to the height of two feet.”[5] Next, he lit the second strip of muslin; but this time, he “laid [it] hollow in an horizontal direction.”[6] Astonishingly, the second piece of material took “nearly ten minutes before it burnt from one end of the piece to the other.”[7] The height of the flame was also greatly reduced, compared to the first experiment, at only “half an inch.”[8] Sir Phillips also reported how easy it was to extinguish the flame in this position with simply the “thumb and finger, or by drawing the hand over it.”[9] Now all these horrible deaths could be adverted by simply lying down horizontally on the floor at the first sight of fire; and then the individual could with ease, either extinguish the flame with the hand, or as Phillips advised, “leisurely call for assistance.”[10]
            What an amazing discovery Sir Phillips made that can so easily be taken for granted today. Just as the Vermont Telegraph stated, “this plain and easy experiment ought to be read in the presence of every family.”[11] Just do not forget to start this family safety meeting without, ‘did you know…?’



[1] “Varieties, Literary and Philosophical,” The Monthly Magazine; or, British Register, vol. 30, part 2, (1810): 556.
[2] Vermont telegraph. (Brandon [Vt.]), 04 Feb. 1836. Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers. Lib. of Congress. <http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83025661/1836-02-04/ed-1/seq-4/>
[3] Ibid.
[4] 556.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Ibid.
[10] Ibid.
[11] Vermont telegraph.

Monday, March 23, 2015

Did you know that Johnny Appleseed’s real name was John Chapman?


            John Chapman, better known as Johnny Appleseed, was born in Leominster, Massachusetts, on September 26, 1774.[1] Born during the apple season and to a family that had been “orchardists for generations,” it is no surprise that John would take a shine to the delicious fruit.[2] In 1780, John’s family to moved further west, after his father was discharged from the Continental army and settled in Longmeadow, Massachusetts. It is there that John most likely started to develop his legendary frontier skills; such that he “could chop as much wood or girdle as many trees in one day as most men could in two.”[3] With each year and each apple tree planted, Johnny Appleseed’s legend grew larger and larger.
            The plethora of tall tales spread about Johnny Appleseed’s adventures on the American frontier originated from the period that followed his appearance in the Ohio territory, in 1801. Whether he was bringing “a horse-load of apple seeds,” a canoe filled to capacity with those wonderful kernels, or a leather sack full of his legacy, John set to work planting his apple orchards in the Ohio territory for all to enjoy.[4] John’s first orchard was planted “on the farm of Isaac Stadden, in what is now Licking County,” Ohio.[5] From there, John planted his apple seeds “at every inviting spot” along his travels throughout the territory.[6]


            John traveled without a weapon and carried a bible. He has been depicted as a man, like John the Baptist, living in the wilderness with little clothing and barefoot. Being the good man that he was and so caring for others, it is true that John would rather offer his worldly belongings to those in need, than keep them for himself. When welcomed into a frontier home, it is said that John would lie down on the floor and inquire, “Will you have some fresh news from heaven?”[7] John was a kind and gentle man; who according to R.I. Curtis said, he “was very fond of children and would talk to me a great deal.”[8] It was also said that this unusual frontiersman “seemed to be as much at home with the red men of the forest as with his own race.”[9]


            This generous man planted more than just apple trees on the edge of civilization, John planted seeds of kindness, peace, and love into the hearts of all those with whom he spoke to. In 1887, Charles Henderson, a professor of sociology, wrote: “We need men like Jonathan Chapman…who carried apple seeds into Ohio, planted them in open spaces, sold or gave away his infant orchards, and left behind him living and grateful mementos of a worthy and devoted life.” So the next time you enjoy a sweet apple, think of and remember the goodness of Johnny Appleseed.





[1] Robert Morgan, Lions of the West: Heroes and Villains of the Westward Expansion, (Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill, 2012), 93.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid, 95.
[4]pasteboard with an immense peak” W.D. Haley, “Johnny Appleseed—A Pioneer Hero,” Harpers Monthly Magazine, vol. 43, (November 1871): 830.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid.
[7] History of Allen County, Ohio, (Chicago: Warner, Beers & Co., 1885), 237.
[8] Morgan, Lions of the West, 95.
[9] Ibid. 

Give me liberty or give me death!



Two hundred and forty years ago, today on March 23, 1775, Patrick Henry addressed the Virginia House of Burgesses and uttered his now famous speech calling upon Virginians to make preparations for war. Henry was a patriot for liberty, who had his fill of British tyranny and oppression of English rights. He had become incensed with the events that led up to his patriotic words passionately spoken that day in Richmond, Virginia. The colonists had suffered by the Stamp Act in 1765; again in 1767, their glass, paint, lead, paper and tea goods were taxed heavily by the Townshend Acts. They had seen five colonial men killed by British troops in front of the State House in Boston three years later in 1770. In 1773, Sons of Liberty, masquerading as Mohawk Indians, boarded the Dartmouth, the Eleanor, and the Beaver, British ships belonging to the East India Company, and dumped their tea into the Boston Harbor in protest. The time had come to organize, since there was no other question other than “freedom or slavery.”[1]   


Patrick Henry could see no other course to take than to either fight for liberty or give into to servitude. He was a witness of the tyrannical events of recent colonial history and knew “of no way of judging of the future but by the past.”[2] History had demonstrated that kings and rulers, determined to maintain control and their power over others, have always resorted to “the implements of war;” which Henry had pointed out to the members attending the Second Virginia Convention that day, by asking them why the King had needed to “call for all this accumulation of navies and armies” in the colonies, if it was not only meant as a means to enslave them.[3] He answered his own question to them, “They are meant for us,”[4]
Henry attempted to show them the folly of their continued attempts at debate and political rhetoric with Parliament and the King of England. In Henry’s opinion, every rational and logical attempt to argue the rights of Englishmen had been made: “Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing.”[5] The colonists had utilized every civil attempt to “avert the storm” that they were unavoidably facing.[6] According to Henry, they had “petitioned;” they had “remonstrated;” they had “supplicated;” they had “prostrated” themselves “before the throne, and [had] implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament.”[7]
The time had come for the colonials to fight for their inalienable rights and freedoms. The time was long gone for British gentlemen to cry, “Peace, Peace…there is no peace.”[8] Henry stood before the delegates that day and guaranteed to them that the war had already begun.[9] It was time to take up arms and meet the enemy or be killed where they stood, helpless, defenseless. But not Patrick Henry; no, not him, he would not stand idly by while the enemy was at the gates. “Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”[10]



[1] Patrick Henry, “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death,” The Avalon Project: Documents in Law, History and Diplomacy, March 23, 1775, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/patrick.asp.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Ibid.
[10] Ibid.